Re: [PEAR-DOC] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DOC] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR CS Documentation Incorrect?

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Hannes Magnusson <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:30, Chuck Burgess <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Since there's no keyword substitution property already set on the file,
> > plain old "$Id$" should do it then... I've committed that fix now.
>
>
> Doesn't that break your translation versioning?
> phpdoc atleast uses the revision tags to see if a translated file is
> outofdate...
>
> -Hannes
>



It looks to me like the 24 occurrences of *$Id* in the 3500+ files of
peardoc/en are all literal text usages rather than actual $Id$ versioning of
the files themselves.  As such, I'm guessing that versioning scheme is not
in play here.  In fact, I see some that are clearly supposed to only be the
"$Id$" string used in sentences, but are expanded out (presumably committed
that way back in the CVS days).  These instances probably need to be edited
back down to just "$Id$".

A good point to review though... thanks for highlighting it, Hannes.
-- 
CRB