Re: [PEAR-QA] [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package

Looks good to me at a glance.

Next step: get yourself an svn account and for me to set you up with the
appropriate karma.
http://php.net/svn.php

Forwarding this email or otherwise including a link to it (ie: mail archive)
doesn't hurt.

I take it silospen is the user account you'll apply for?


On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor <
> [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP package.
> I'm
> >>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've found a
> bug
> >>> or
> >>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features I'm
> >>> adding
> >>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06. I'd also
> >>> like
> >>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use this
> >>> library as it's not really documented!
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches?
> >> Ditto  http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > I've added/patched the bug I found:
> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and added a patch to:
> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492
> >
> > Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to even
> in
> that little snippet. http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 should now
> be
> correct!
>