Re: [PEAR-QA] [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package

Karma added.

Some housekeeping tasks for you when the SVN account comes through:
 1) Upgrade to package 2.0 (pear convert && cp package2.xml package.xml)
 2) Fix the internal directory structure (svn mkdir Net && svn mv SMPP Net
&& svn mv SMPP.php Net); and regenerate the package.xml (I suggest
pear_packagefilemanager_cli - then it's just 'pfm' and answering a few
questions)
 3) Apply your patches
 4) Some basic unit test coverage wouldn't hurt :) (PHPUnit ftw)
 5) Prepare your new release :)

We're on #pear / irc.efnet.org if you have questions, or of course the
pear-dev mailing list.


On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]>wrote:

> Great! I applied for an SVN account with, as you guessed, the user account
> 'silospen'.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Daniel O'Connor <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Looks good to me at a glance.
>>
>> Next step: get yourself an svn account and for me to set you up with the
>> appropriate karma.
>> http://php.net/svn.php
>>
>> Forwarding this email or otherwise including a link to it (ie: mail
>> archive) doesn't hurt.
>>
>> I take it silospen is the user account you'll apply for?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor <
>>> [email protected]
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hello,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP package.
>>> I'm
>>> >>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've found a
>>> bug
>>> >>> or
>>> >>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features I'm
>>> >>> adding
>>> >>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06. I'd
>>> also
>>> >>> like
>>> >>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use this
>>> >>> library as it's not really documented!
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches?
>>> >> Ditto  http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > I've added/patched the bug I found:
>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and added a patch to:
>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492
>>> >
>>> > Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to even
>>> in
>>> that little snippet. http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 should
>>> now be
>>> correct!
>>>
>>
>>
>