Re: [PEAR-QA] [Net_SMPP] Taking over unmaintained package

[email protected] ("Daniel O'Connor")
Newsgroups php.pear.qa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
:) Looks like you are on your way already.

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks a lot for the list of tasks, they're very useful as I'm still trying
> to read and understand all the PEAR guidelines/rules.
>
> Hopefully, there'll be a new release soonish! See you on IRC.
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Daniel O'Connor <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Karma added.
>>
>> Some housekeeping tasks for you when the SVN account comes through:
>>  1) Upgrade to package 2.0 (pear convert && cp package2.xml package.xml)
>>  2) Fix the internal directory structure (svn mkdir Net && svn mv SMPP Net
>> && svn mv SMPP.php Net); and regenerate the package.xml (I suggest
>> pear_packagefilemanager_cli - then it's just 'pfm' and answering a few
>> questions)
>>  3) Apply your patches
>>  4) Some basic unit test coverage wouldn't hurt :) (PHPUnit ftw)
>>  5) Prepare your new release :)
>>
>> We're on #pear / irc.efnet.org if you have questions, or of course the
>> pear-dev mailing list.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Great! I applied for an SVN account with, as you guessed, the user
>>> account 'silospen'.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Daniel O'Connor <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks good to me at a glance.
>>>>
>>>> Next step: get yourself an svn account and for me to set you up with the
>>>> appropriate karma.
>>>> http://php.net/svn.php
>>>>
>>>> Forwarding this email or otherwise including a link to it (ie: mail
>>>> archive) doesn't hurt.
>>>>
>>>> I take it silospen is the user account you'll apply for?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Simon Spencer <[email protected]
>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel O'Connor <
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Simon Spencer <
>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>> Hello,
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I'd like to express my interest in taking over the NET_SMPP
>>>>> package. I'm
>>>>> >>> currently implementing an ESME to send SMPP packages and I've found
>>>>> a bug
>>>>> >>> or
>>>>> >>> two and I would like to add a few features. One of the features I'm
>>>>> >>> adding
>>>>> >>> is currently listed as a feature request on the site from '06. I'd
>>>>> also
>>>>> >>> like
>>>>> >>> to add some more examples to show developers how they should use
>>>>> this
>>>>> >>> library as it's not really documented!
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Sounds good! Re the bugs, can you add bug reports and patches?
>>>>> >> Ditto  http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492 ?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> > I've added/patched the bug I found:
>>>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 and added a patch to:
>>>>> > http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9492
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Well, I thought I could conform to PEAR standards, but I failed to
>>>>> even in
>>>>> that little snippet. http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=17308 should
>>>>> now be
>>>>> correct!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.