Re: [PEAR-QA] Taking over Net_DNS

[email protected] (Ian Pye)
Newsgroups php.pear.qa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the encouragement. I re-submitted a patch, which removes
some of the most egregious faults. I don't see any other Unit tests in
the NET_dns package -- am I not looking in the right place?

Ian

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Daniel O'Connor
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Matthew Fonda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ian Pye <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > Here you go: https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11665
>>
>>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> Please ensure your patch adheres to the PEAR coding standards.
>> See http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php
>>
>
> Just to expand on that - we're about to pick on you a lot re coding
> standards and some of the approach you've taken when implementing your
> class.
> We're not being nasty; we're just looking for a few common traits that lead
> to maintainable code.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEhu57pih5w is a great watch to understand
> why we're on about no-work-in-constructor, unit testings, why we think
> global state is bad, etc.
>
> Please do give it another shot, we're keen to have patches :)
> -Daniel
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.