Re: [PEAR-QA] Taking over Net_DNS
[email protected] (Ian Pye)
| Newsgroups | php.pear.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > Oops! Try: > > clockwerx@clockwerx-desktop:~/pear/Net_DNS/trunk$ php tests/AllTests.php Ahh! SVN. The tests directory is not in the release tarballs. > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Oneeee more round of picking on! >> Re: unit tests - well; it's never too early to start some coverage. >> I might put on my QA hat and make some test skeletons. >> >> At the moment, I'll apply the patch in its current form + some minor fixes >> to make it a bit more testable. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Ian Pye <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the encouragement. I re-submitted a patch, which removes >>> some of the most egregious faults. I don't see any other Unit tests in >>> the NET_dns package -- am I not looking in the right place? >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Daniel O'Connor >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Matthew Fonda <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ian Pye <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Hey, >>> >> > >>> >> > Here you go: https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11665 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi Ian, >>> >> >>> >> Please ensure your patch adheres to the PEAR coding standards. >>> >> See http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php >>> >> >>> > >>> > Just to expand on that - we're about to pick on you a lot re coding >>> > standards and some of the approach you've taken when implementing your >>> > class. >>> > We're not being nasty; we're just looking for a few common traits that >>> > lead >>> > to maintainable code. >>> > >>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEhu57pih5w is a great watch to >>> > understand >>> > why we're on about no-work-in-constructor, unit testings, why we think >>> > global state is bad, etc. >>> > >>> > Please do give it another shot, we're keen to have patches :) >>> > -Daniel >>> > >> > >