Re: Jesus Espino - qa team?
[email protected] ("Daniel O'Connor")
| Newsgroups | php.pear.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Summary of votes: Ken Guest: +1 Daniel O'Connor: +1 David Coallier: + 1 Michael Gauthier: +1 Not technically enough according to http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60 ; but I would suggest it's within the spirit of the RFC. So, Jesus - congratulations, welcome to the QA team. If you haven't already I would suggest you subscribe to pear-qa to participate in discussions like this. Also; have a read through the above link for the ins and outs of what we do. Some obvious things to point out: 1. You have the svn/pearweb/political clout to go in and fix bugs in packages if they are serious (BC breaks, parse errors, security, etc); or ignored for over a month after you've hassled the authors. 2. If you do bugfixes/etc; ensure you mention it in the relevant svn commits 3. As above for releases: if you are releasing a package for QA purposes, whack "QA release" into the changelog 4. Try to work with existing maintainers and give them a chance to fix things up. 5. Obviously you don't need to become a maintainer on all of the packages Let us know if you've got questions On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]>wrote: > He's floating around doing QA work; and it'll be simpler than adding him as > a maintainer everywhere > Votes? >