Re: Jesus Espino - qa team?

[email protected] ("Daniel O'Connor")
Newsgroups php.pear.qa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Summary of votes:
Ken Guest: +1
Daniel O'Connor: +1
David Coallier: + 1
Michael Gauthier: +1

Not technically enough according to
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60 ; but I would suggest
it's within the spirit of the RFC.

So, Jesus - congratulations, welcome to the QA team. If you haven't already
I would suggest you subscribe to pear-qa to participate in discussions like
this.

Also; have a read through the above link for the ins and outs of what we do.

Some obvious things to point out:
 1. You have the svn/pearweb/political clout to go in and fix bugs in
packages if they are serious (BC breaks, parse errors, security, etc); or
ignored for over a month after you've hassled the authors.
 2. If you do bugfixes/etc; ensure you mention it in the relevant svn
commits
 3. As above for releases: if you are releasing a package for QA purposes,
whack "QA release" into the changelog
 4. Try to work with existing maintainers and give them a chance to fix
things up.
 5. Obviously you don't need to become a maintainer on all of the packages

Let us know if you've got questions



On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]>wrote:

> He's floating around doing QA work; and it'll be simpler than adding him as
> a maintainer everywhere
> Votes?
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.