Re: [PEAR-QA] QA karma, clockwerx

[email protected] (Christian Weiske)
Newsgroups php.pear.qa
Message-ID <20101026064752.7c089d2f@bogo>
Daniel,


> I think one of the problems we have is that written and unwritten
> rules aren't really enforced too often. I pissed a lot of active
> maintainers off recently, and did so by breaking an unwritten rule
> about communication.
> 
> I think it would be healthy to bring this issue to a head; so...
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=60
> 
> Should clockwerx retain QA karma?
> +1 / -1

+1 without a question.


-- 
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske

-=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzGXXgACgkQFMhaCCTq+CMWjgCgsAwKbs/CFhervLh/uhm8mYc4
pPYAoINdNBD67qKgFsqvmEVQNnRsNIW2
=wfDU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.