Re: [PEAR-QA] Net_Growl package status

[email protected] (Laurent Laville)
Newsgroups php.pear.qa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Christian,

I was about to push my code on PEAR repository [1], when I discover that 
there is no previous source code for Net_Growl.

First question : is it normal (while there are previous other releases 
when we have a CVS repository) ?

Second question : does it means I should push code as it is a first 
creation, and does I have the rights (as I'm until now listed as 
contributor to this project) ?

Thanks in advance

Oh! ... forget to wish you a happy new year 2011 Christian

Laurent


Le 31/12/2010 11:11, Christian Weiske a écrit :
> Hello Laurent,
>
>
>
>> As you perharps know, package Net_Growl [1] on branch 0.x was
>> unmaintained since a long time (Bertrand is too busy).
>>
>> I've rewrote a full PHP5 version on major version 2.
>> Since January 2010, the initial version 2.0.0 has evolved once time
>> (2.1.0) and only one bug know was fixed (2.1.1).
>>
>> This version is pretty stable on my opinion, and if you're agree it
>> could be includes in the main PEAR repository, unless you don't agree
>> with something.
>
> Please push it into PEAR. Maybe even as Net_Growl, not creating a new
> Net_Growl2 package but using the current one.
>

[1] http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pear/packages/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.