Proposal: Migrate unmaintained packages to github
[email protected] ("Daniel O'Connor") Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:48:41 +0930
| Newsgroups | php.pear.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJsZyFDDh6xF8t=2ACAj_6Uzh=ZGtTejuSC-gxNkF9LY_du+cg@mail.gmail.com> |
We've got a number of unmaintained packages: http://pear.php.net/qa/packages_orphan.php We regularly get requests from folks to take over packages; but it's a bit of a hassle to greet them; assess them; get them karma; etc. A lot of us are comfortable with git. The migration path is trivial (git-svn; update package source link; remove from pear svn); with the exception of losing the CI service without a bit of mucking around. Git removes much friction from accepting patches/etc; once you get over the initial learning curve. So... what would be compelling reasons *not* to migrate packages? All I've got so far: 1) Validate_* have a unique dir structure which would be a pain to untangle. 2) There's a lot of packages; most of them without open bugs; so why muck around with them Anyone else?