Re: [PEAR-QA] is_a() and the need for improved testing
[email protected] ("Daniel O'Connor") Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:12:02 +0930
| Newsgroups | php.pear.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJsZyFAgtf3hauAzuoEqfGY8b1Z2Y_N7qXWJtFvhZZZh55nB4g@mail.gmail.com> |
> > > 2) The output needs to be tracked. New failures/etc need to generate a > notification to the QA team or something. > > Yeah; I agree - I thought I had cruise control working right; and there is an RSS feed of new errors; but the amount of visibility it actually gives you it pitiful. Having played with jenkins at work briefly; and having seen the amount of effort it takes to coax cruisecontrol to work; I'd consider switching rather than fixing. > > 5) Nearly all of the PHPUnit tests and some of the phpt tests are choking > on the inability to find required files. > Where this is phpunit 3.5 vs phpunit 3.4; it's generally easy to clean up. Fatal error: Class 'PHPUnit_Runner_BaseTestRunner' not found in /usr/local/lib/php/pear/PHPUnit/TextUI/TestRunner.php on line 60 php -c ../php.ini -f /home/clockwerx/packages-all/Image_Color/tests/AllTests.php Previously; I've just selectively installed dependencies rather than muck around with symlinks