Re: [PEAR-DEV] Optimizing the PEPr process - proposals move automatically to voting after N weeks
[email protected] ("Daniel O'Connor") Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:24:46 +0930
| Newsgroups | php.pear.dev,php.pear.webmaster |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJsZyFA2kCepT_Wps9Xw6B6WCjDjk_HxVHJhFerpedgqKroAEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 17:13, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thoughts/votes? > > What about a new "abandoned" category, where all proposals are put, if > the voting has not been started in 6 months after the proposal? > The same could be implemented for drafts. > I see two scenarios - good code that should be in PEAR (or pear installable via some framework); which languishes in proposal mode or the author runs out of time/steam/etc; and... not so good code where the author needs a bit more guidance or experience; or a better use case to solve. The abandoned category solves case #2 really well; but not case #1. It's my hope that by automating this step; we can have a slightly cleaner process; solve both use cases; and do it all without much (coding) effort.