Re: [PHP-PEAR] RFC on merge of PHPLib and Pear
[email protected] (Ulf Wendel) Thu, 08 Mar 2001 20:23:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | php.pear |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Jeffrey A. Stuart" wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Meagher [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:42 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [PHP-PEAR] RFC on merge of PHPLib and Pear > > > > > > > [...my message deleted...] > > The thought of creating a pre-pear staging area on sourceforge had occured > > to me as well. I'm in favor of a process that doesn't involve me having > > to be "blessed" by the PHP Group before I can contribute alpha level code. > > I think blessing code (i.e., thorough code review by leading PEAR > > contributors/commentators - Chuck, Jon, Stig, etc???) that ultimately goes > > into PEAR is a good idea, however. > > > > Regards, > > Paul > > ok... here's what I'm gonna do... :) I'm going to create a SF project for the > initial work... Once that's done, we can see what all can/will get moved > over... I'm not really happy with a "pre-pear" repository. This would mean that for all time packages that get developed by more than one person start in another CVS but the PEAR repository :/ which complicates contributions and stops people helping. Rember the cool book of Tobias (Ratschiller) and Till (Gerken) and their chapter on the project layout. They suggest a development, a staging and a life server. I'm afraid we will not get this on php.net. At PHPLib we used a release conzept plus a dev and a life CVS. Releases will not work for PEAR as no one has the time to prepare releases. But we might consider a directory Experimental/ in the (life) CVS we have plus a README "This is experimental, no warranty at all, no docs, sorry..". Within the directory we use the planned directory structure. Ulf