Re: [PECL-DEV] filesystem notification extension

On 06-08-2024 18:29, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 05.08.2024 at 17:21, Frederik Bosch wrote:
>
>> On 04-08-2024 20:27, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>>
>>> I'm generally fine having PECL extensions written in Rust, *if* these
>>> extension clearly signal that requirement.  A prominent note in the
>>> documentation would certainly a good first step.  Not sure what else
>>> could be done; upgrading the PECL package.xml format might be an option
>>> (does it even signal whether an extension requires an C++ compiler?)
>> Thank you for your work so far. I think signaling, for me, is no
>> problem. A specific tag or attribute in the package.xml would be a good
>> way forward, maybe a new tag <cargo> under <dependencies>. But in the
>> meantime the description tag and the documentation page can address it too.
> That appears to be a sensible compromise for now.  If nobody objects, I
> think we should proceed in a couple of days.
>
> Do you already have a PECL account, Frederik?  (sorry, I've lost track)
>
> Christoph
Hi Christoph,

That's great. I don't have a PECL account yet.

Regards,
Frederik