Re: [PECL-DEV] official dead pecl extensions
[email protected] (Pierre Joye)
| Newsgroups | php.pecl.dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Christopher Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you have a hierarchy of obsolescence plan, e.g > > - After 1 year / 1 major release add "unmaintained" to the existing doc > - After 2 years etc move the doc pages to an appendix of obsolete > extensions > - After 3 years move the doc to the package's pecl page Time based classification makes no sense. One recent example to illustrate why is inclued. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org