Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: shared memory extention

hi,

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Olivier Hill <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I think Pierre means the extension itself, and not the library it links
>> against. Though I could be wrong, I'm far from being a licencing expert ;)
>
> Hope so, his statement was not too clear ;)
>
> I do agree that the extension itself cannot be LGPL, but libraries
> used for linking can be.

My statement was rether clear :):

> For new extensions we only accept BSD-like licenses (new BSD, MIT for
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> example), Apache or PHP License.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org