Re: APC beta status

[email protected] (Gopal V)
Newsgroups php.pecl.dev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:24 PM, Matteo Beccati wrote:

> mayb I ask if there's a good reason for APC 3.1.3p1 to be still tagged
> as beta in pecl close to one year after its release? My guess is that
> it's because of the PHP4 compatibility break, but of course there might
> be another reason.

The entire memory management was rewritten in apc-3.1.x branch.

> I'm asking because I'm trying to get the Sourceguardian team to fix
> their loader extension to work with the latest APC, which is currently
> untested because it's still beta software. Bringing them proof that it
> actually is not might help me change their minds ;)

If you want to really throw your weight behind getting it to stable,
I'd ask you to test the svn which I'm sort of polishing up to a 3.1.4
release (which I want to call "stable"). Though maybe, really it's just
time for another Beta before I flip it over as stable.

I want people to do some solid QA on it, because the unit tests barely
qualify as real tests under load, which is where the stability really
gets tested.

Cheers,
Gopal
-- 
If I learn from my mistakes, pretty soon I'll know everything.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.