Re: APC beta status
[email protected] (Gopal V)
| Newsgroups | php.pecl.dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:24 PM, Matteo Beccati wrote: > mayb I ask if there's a good reason for APC 3.1.3p1 to be still tagged > as beta in pecl close to one year after its release? My guess is that > it's because of the PHP4 compatibility break, but of course there might > be another reason. The entire memory management was rewritten in apc-3.1.x branch. > I'm asking because I'm trying to get the Sourceguardian team to fix > their loader extension to work with the latest APC, which is currently > untested because it's still beta software. Bringing them proof that it > actually is not might help me change their minds ;) If you want to really throw your weight behind getting it to stable, I'd ask you to test the svn which I'm sort of polishing up to a 3.1.4 release (which I want to call "stable"). Though maybe, really it's just time for another Beta before I flip it over as stable. I want people to do some solid QA on it, because the unit tests barely qualify as real tests under load, which is where the stability really gets tested. Cheers, Gopal -- If I learn from my mistakes, pretty soon I'll know everything.