Re: [STANDARDS] Splittling into chapters?

[email protected] (La Magia Moreno)
Newsgroups php.standards
Message-ID <CAMLN3Gzuo48U8jkEp4NBoB2taGKF3zHozu6JfYgZ6u6fpbPGJQ@mail.gmail.com>
I pull requested a script called "chapterizer" that does exactly that, it
divides the text in chapters by title and parse all links, the general case
I solve it with a variable that counts by chapter.


2014-07-31 23:14 GMT-03:00 Stas Malyshev <[email protected]>:

> Hi!
>
> > Very nice!  I think this split is the overall right strategy for sanity
> > of future changes, etc.
>
> I've found a wrinkle in this script though... If we have a number of
> topics with the same name ("General" seems to be most popular) then when
> we use big file, the topic Postfix Operators/General is labelled as
> "general-13", but in file 10-expressions.md it's now "general-3", since
> it that particular file there's only three links named "General". This
> requires renaming all the anchors with repeated names. Which can be
> done, but then this no longer can be merged back into the single file,
> at least not easily. I'll fix the script and update the pull in a bit.
> Since the anchor names are generated automatically and AFAIK there's no
> way to override them, the only way to avoid it would be not using the
> same names, but that's hard to do.
>
> > One thing I will advise is that since we have links all over the place
> > pointing to the current all-in-one spec php-spec-draft.md, we should
> > either have a redirect from it to the table of contents
> > (00-specification-for-php.md) or just copy the table of contents
> directly
> > into that file. Because I think we should remove the big blob and have
> > people directed to the table of contents, if we are going this route.
>
> I think we can put the copy of 00-specification-for-php.md when ready.
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
>
> --
> PHP Naming Standardization Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.