Re: [STANDARDS] NULL vs. null
[email protected] (Peter Cowburn)
| Newsgroups | php.standards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPg3XxKPMmdH2vKxbNfLOo9oZcO1i-NZxfDceUuMAF_JaAWqHA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 2 August 2014 01:57, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> If anything our documentation should be consistent about that first :) > > > > Well, we're not going to rewrite the manual, but in the spec it's pretty > > easy to be consistent, if we decide so. > > Why not? > For the record, the docs follow the PEAR CS, which says > false/true/null should be all lowercase: > http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.naming.php We (the documentation team) also have the differentiation that, in prose, “NULL" is to be used for the value null, and “null” for the type null. > > > -Hannes > > -- > PHP Naming Standardization Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >