Re: [STANDARDS] Can we use PHPT instead of .php and .php.expect

[email protected] (Stas Malyshev)
Newsgroups php.standards
Organization SugarCRM
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

> Why are the spec tests so basic, using just .php and .php.expect
> files? Is there a good reason not to use the more sophisticated,
> though still lightweight and simple, PHPT test format used by php.net
> PHP? This way, we could write tests that work for both (or even share
> tests), and you would be able to use EXPECTFs (which are
> super-handy).

Using phpt would be nice. I wonder if we could write a script that
converts php+expect pairs into phpt.

-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.