Re: [STANDARDS] Can we use PHPT instead of .php and .php.expect

[email protected] (Nikita Popov)
Newsgroups php.standards
Message-ID <CAF+90c_GX54ogWhSPGDw3N4hbbOVV-Uoy19tWWxmQM1FvhOi3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Sara Golemon <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Nikita Popov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > The phpt/ folder is not being kept updated. Anybody object to dropping it
> > from the repo? It's trivial to generate it using ./make_phpt
> >
> > Alternatively drop the original files and only use phpt. Probably better
> > because we have stuff like SKIPIF (for 32bit vs 64bit).
> >
> It's trivial to generate one into the other in either direction, so I
> don't care much which we declare as the source.
>
> I'm partial to .phpt, myself...
>
> -Sara
>

I've now adopted the .phpt tests as the canonical version. Should I write
some script to generate .php and .php.expect files from them, or does HHVM
already have something for that?

And as an off-topic aside: We've already fixed three minor bugs in the PHP
7 implementation thanks to the spec tests :)

Nikita
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.