Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] PHP Template Engine spec revision 0.52

[email protected] (Andrei Zmievski) Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:36:50 -0600
Newsgroups php.template
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Cliff Rowley wrote:
> Yup yup, I'm completely with you, good stuff.  There have been situations
> where I have handed over sites to clients who wish to maintain it after
> I've finished with it.  More often than not they've returned to me after
> realising they've jumped in a little out of their depth.  While this is
> not a bad thing for my wallet, it's not good for my workload.  Being able
> to hand them off to a template engine would be a great asset in this
> situation.
> 
> I would use it myself too, since I build my sites from templates.  You
> know, the whole idea sorta reminds me of sgml in a funny sorta way ;)
> 
> As far as saying "PHP already does what we need..." is not an
> argument.  Adding a template engine bears no effect on those who choose
> not to use it.

Exactly.

-Andrei
* I wish life had an UNDO function. *