Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] PHP Template Engine spec revision 0.52
[email protected] (Andrei Zmievski) Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:36:50 -0600
| Newsgroups | php.template |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Cliff Rowley wrote: > Yup yup, I'm completely with you, good stuff. There have been situations > where I have handed over sites to clients who wish to maintain it after > I've finished with it. More often than not they've returned to me after > realising they've jumped in a little out of their depth. While this is > not a bad thing for my wallet, it's not good for my workload. Being able > to hand them off to a template engine would be a great asset in this > situation. > > I would use it myself too, since I build my sites from templates. You > know, the whole idea sorta reminds me of sgml in a funny sorta way ;) > > As far as saying "PHP already does what we need..." is not an > argument. Adding a template engine bears no effect on those who choose > not to use it. Exactly. -Andrei * I wish life had an UNDO function. *