[OT]: comments on the template engine example document

nah,
I wasn't clear.
I don't argue about {alternate} keyword in particular.
I do argue about the fact that you seem to say that using some logic in the 
template
is easier to use for a designer than using some php code.
Then I said:
   + yes it might be for a native english speaker
   + but for non english speaker, it's the same: just a keyword with some 
logic.

Yes, I still haven't figured out WHY there must be some logic in the 
templates...
I'm gonna ask a few more designers about this, and I'll give you some feedback

Anyway, forget about it,
  I'll just wait for your engine, make some speed test,
and then I'll see.

--

At 13:12 23/03/00 -0600, monte wrote:
>jm wrote:
> >
> > I hope my example was clear...
> > I found that quite powerful and therefore my rejection of "logic" stuff
> > directly in the template. Another thing you might want to consider is that
> > not all people are native english speaker and a
> > {section}
> > {alternate}
> > {/section}
> > is as complicated for them as some php code.
> >
>
>How about:
>{section}
>{sectionelse}
>{/section}
>
>
>we already have:
>{if}
>{else}
>{/if}
>
>We could follow this syntax concept. It would be tough to make the
>syntax meaningful in all languages.
>
>Monte