Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] template engine example document

[email protected] (Ron Chmara) Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:34:37 -0700
Newsgroups php.template
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Ron Chmara wrote:
> > It really depends on the workflow. It's an ill suited workflow for
> > sites which only have a few master documents, with very few changes.
> > For a site that constantly revises portions of their pages, it makes
> > it much easier than revising 20-50 template documents.
> 
> Sites that constantly revise portions of their page can still make use
> of templates. 'include' statement is there for a reason.

AH. But then we both have the same "many branches in the tree" problem,
don't we? I choose to build my example in those smaller branches so
I can reuse the logic pieces (design logic, function logic, etc.) as
often as I need them...

Now we've gone from syntactic debates to stylistic debates. :-)

-Bop

--
Brought to you from boop!, the dual boot Linux/Win95 Compaq Presario 1625
laptop, currently running RedHat 6.1. Your bopping may vary.