Re: [PHP Template] Re: [PHP3] template engine example document
[email protected] (Ron Chmara) Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:34:37 -0700
| Newsgroups | php.template |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrei Zmievski wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Ron Chmara wrote: > > It really depends on the workflow. It's an ill suited workflow for > > sites which only have a few master documents, with very few changes. > > For a site that constantly revises portions of their pages, it makes > > it much easier than revising 20-50 template documents. > > Sites that constantly revise portions of their page can still make use > of templates. 'include' statement is there for a reason. AH. But then we both have the same "many branches in the tree" problem, don't we? I choose to build my example in those smaller branches so I can reuse the logic pieces (design logic, function logic, etc.) as often as I need them... Now we've gone from syntactic debates to stylistic debates. :-) -Bop -- Brought to you from boop!, the dual boot Linux/Win95 Compaq Presario 1625 laptop, currently running RedHat 6.1. Your bopping may vary.