Re: [PHP Template] dynamic blocks

[email protected] (Sanford Redlich)
Newsgroups php.template
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I like Monte's option #2, with the curly braces (the $$ thing could lead to
mistakes that might be confusing to the designer if s/he forgot to use two
dollar signs).


Sanford


At 11:17 AM 2/16/2000 -0600, Monte Ohrt wrote:
>Ludovico Magnocavallo wrote:
>> 
>> > No, they will be removed by the engine and will not appear on the page
>> > at all.
>> 
>> Andrei, my point is that designers will work on BARE templates, and open
>> them up in netscape or ie to test layout, etc. indipendently from any
>> engine or script. At least, that's what our designers do, they edit the
>> templates indipendently from me, or other developers, and they edit them
>> as STATIC HTML files.
>> 
>> So the engine will NOT be there to process templates for them, and they
>> WILL see the dynblocks declarations on the page, unless the developer
>> masks them inside HTML comments.
>> 
>> L.
>> 
>
>Good point. We've never run into this problem, our designers always
>edit the templates in a text editing program and view the pages in
>their browser as seen generated by php.
>
>So what would be a good syntax to cover this issue? I'll just
>throw a couple ideas out, you can shoot them down as you see fit :-)
>
>OPTION #1: hide the tags in HTML comments
>
><!-- {dynamic: row } -->
>
><!-- {/dynamic} -->
>
>Pros: will hide the contents from browsers when displayed directly
>
>Cons: A little messy looking, and a bit more info for the
>	template engine to parse out, a little more syntax
>	for a designer to learn.
>
>
>OPTION #2: use normal HTML markup for template tags
>
><dynamic: row>
>	<tr>
>		<td>{title}</td>
>	</tr>
></dynamic>
>
><if title != "foo">
>	{title}
></if>
>
>Pros: it keeps the template clean and easy to read, and the tags
>will be hidden when brought up by the browser. This is also nice
>for the designer, they are mostly likely familiar with how HTML
>markup works, so no new tag syntax to learn.
>
>Cons: It has a possiblity of conflicting with browser tags, like
>if someone makes a CSS element called "dynamic"
>
>
>Yet another idea that goes along with OPTION #2, get rid of
>curly braces altogether, and use a '$' to denote variables:
>
><if $title != "foo">
>	<b>$title</b> is $$5.00
></if>
>
>
>Notice double $$ to escape a literal '$'
>Any other ideas?
>
>Monte
>
>
-------
Sanford Redlich
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.