Re: [PHP4BETA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.0Release packaged
[email protected] (Rasmus Lerdorf)
| Newsgroups | php.version4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I don't want to bring back that discussion. Rest assured that there were > plenty of opportunities to get me a CVS account. It was Rasmus that told > me to post a feature request report with my HTTP PUT support patch instead > of getting me a CVS account to let me do it. The patch was left rotten in > the bug database for months until Jim had a go at it and integrated it. > > I understand your good intentions to make this not look like it was not > personal. But there is no excuse for Rasmus. He didn't grant me a CVS > account because he never wanted to. But lets gets over this because this > discussion leads nowhere. Oh man, here you go again. I asked you intially if you were going to be contributing anything else other than this PUT thing. You said you probably wouldn't have time. For one-off things we don't generally hand out accounts. When I tried your patch it didn't work and messing with the POST handling code is pretty sensitive stuff, so you are right, I wasn't keen on that bit of code. Then you went on and on about being discriminated against to the point where I just stopped reading your messages. > Now that you managed to grant me a CVS account (thank you), I can imagine > how heated must have been the discussion between you guys to step over > Rasmus pride to make him accept it. :-) Huh? There was no discussion. There usually isn't on any of these cvs account decisions. You just need to be able to convince one of us you need one and they will set you up. So back when I didn't give you a cvs account, neither did anybody else. > But lets move on. I talked with Evan Klinger that told me that he > added code to PHP 4 to support calls like select()/listen() to > sockets, but you guys commented out the code to have it reimplement > somehow more convinient. What's the status of that? I really could > use those functions for many interesting purposes that are useful for > Web developers (backend servers without needing Web servers and other > sorts of TCP deamons). Well, we do have some code review. Evan's code was a bit akward and needs to be cleaned up before it can go in. -Rasmus