Re: [PHP-XML-DEV] domxml002 test fails

[email protected] (Kevin Waterson)
Newsgroups php.xml.dev
Organization Oceania
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This one time, at band camp, Christian Stocker <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Rob Richards wrote:
> 
> > You should use with --with-dom (old domxml extension) or --with-dom5
> > and --wth-xsl (for the new dom and new xsl support) if you need xsl support.
> > Do not load the old and new extensions together. This can lead to unexpected
> > problems as many registered class names are the same.
> 
> mmmh, so upgrading to dom5 has to happen for all applications at once on a
> php-installation... Not an ideal solution IMHO. But as I have not really
> time to look into that at the moment, nor any idea of how to solve that
> problem, I won't complain ;) (maybe namespaces would have been a solution,
> but that's too late now...)

This could prove difficult for hosts..

does the --with-xsl replace the need for --with-dom-xslt?

anyway, I configure --with-dom5 and --with-xsl and I am back to
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: domxml_new_xmldoc()
and the domxml functions do not show in get_defined_functions

if I configure --with-dom=/usr and --with-dom5 --with-xsl I get
[Sun Jun 15 11:07:32 2003] [notice] child pid 2099 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
but, the domxml functions do appear in get_defined_functions()

Kind regards 
Kevin

-- 
 ______                              
(_____ \                             
 _____) )  ____   ____   ____   ____ 
|  ____/  / _  ) / _  | / ___) / _  )
| |      ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ / 
|_|       \____) \_||_| \____) \____)
Kevin Waterson
Port Macquarie, Australia
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.