Re: [PHP-XML-DEV] domxml in PHP5

[email protected] (Christian Stocker)
Newsgroups php.xml.dev
Organization Bitflux GmbH
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 15:29, Rob Richards wrote:
> So, in short, we shouldn't add any more functionality into the extension (as
> it wont be going into the 4_3 branch anyways), and concentrate on memory
> issues (as these would work for both) and/or layout of new extension.
> 
> The thing we should be prepared for, unless we are going to create a
> completely new extension, is what happens if it is not ready for roll out
> time.

That's an issue. But until PHP5 is prime-time ready, there will be still
some months...

> For seperating files, I think by module to start would be easier for now.
> Once things are moving along we can then think about breaking it down into
> classes if needed. In the short term will probably make coding faster as
> there will probably be a lot of cut and paste going on (at least for the
> function internals).

sure.


> So, would the plan to do a re-write within the domxml extension or make a
> new extension and then depreciate the old one?

I vote for rewrite and not making a new extension.

chregu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.