Re: [PHP-XML-DEV] new extension vs. old one
[email protected] ((Marcus Börger))
| Newsgroups | php.xml.dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 09:39 25.04.2003, Christian Stocker wrote: >On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 23:23, Rob Richards wrote: > > Are we planning on scrapping the old extension and trying to go with > the new > > one only or are we going to keep the old one and roll out a new one under a > > different name? > >I'll vote for a completely new extension -> new name. me, too. > > In previous threads it was discussed about php4 and php5 compatibility. I > > don't see this as being too realistic right now. The new extension so far > > is leveraging a lot of new features of the engine. Not only will it > allow us > > to get closer to the specs, but also making it easier to deal with the > > libxml2 handling. > >If it's too much work, then we should not try to do php4 compatibility. >I'd prefer on concentrating rolling something useful out with php5. If >someone wants to backport it later, so be it ;) me, too. > > Also, how long will php4 be supported once php5 rolls out? > > > > Basically will we need to keep supporting the old extension or is that > > pretty much it other than possible bug fixes (if they are serious)? > >yes, would say so. some bugfixes is enough for the old one...they shall use the new one once it is out. marcus