Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Reorganization and splitting
[email protected] (Wez Furlong)
| Newsgroups | svn.migration |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Want != need... what's the technical reason for having multiple repos? --Wez. On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote: > On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Wez Furlong wrote: >> Why do any modules need their own repo? > > PEAR, PECL, and GTK all want their own, for three examples. > >> On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:48 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote: >>> In order to progress further on the SVN conversion, I need to know >>> how many projects need separate repositories from php-src, and the >>> purpose and active status of *all* the current CVS modules. The >>> complete list of current CVS modules is appended to the end of >>> this e-mail. Anyone with status information on them, please step >>> forward and let me know. And anyone who knows which projects need >>> to be their own SVN repository, instead of merged with that of php- >>> src, also please let me know. > > -- Gwynne, Daughter of the Code > "This whole world is an asylum for the incurable." >