RE: [SVN-MIGRATION] Github

Based on their web site it seems that for some large organization they are willing to skip the SaaS setup and do onsite hosting. Maybe this is an option?

Also, is what you are saying that git in itself does not have quite enough value/convenience for us to move but with Github it becomes extremely compelling because of the value-add? (Not disagreeing but just interested to understand whether the decision here is SVN vs. git or SVN vs. Github)

Andi

> -----Original Message-----	
> From: Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 5:00 PM
> To: Rasmus Lerdorf
> Cc: Travis Swicegood; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Github
> 
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I think another point of dissent would be username issues.  'rasmus' was
> > already taken on github, for example, so 10+ years of commits under
> > 'rasmus' now needs to be mapped to some other user id?  That doesn't
> > sound appealing.
> 
> Question then would be if they are ready to create a new user database
> for us that only works with php.github.org or something similar ?
> Probably not the ideal solution either since I'd not be using my
> normal github username for the php repo and thus losing one of the
> attractiveness of moving to github.
> 
> - Helgi
> 
> --
> SVN Migration Project Mailing List (http://svn.php.net)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php