Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Github or not?

I'm relatively ambivalent; my experience with git so far has been  
fairly minimal and unsatisfactory (finding a way to just download a  
tarball of the source seems "difficult" to me in the git web frontends  
I've visited).  I know this is just me being unfamiliar with it though.

If I had to pick between svn and git, I would choose svn because it's  
more of a known entity for me.  I don't have enough technical  
understanding of git to make a properly objective comparison.

svn: +1
git: +0 (not opposed, but not rooting for it)

--Wez.

On Apr 3, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

> We have seen little movement on anything for a while.  Could I get a
> simple yay/nay on moving things forward with Github?  No need for
> long-winded diatribes, just a gut-feeling yay or nay either way is  
> fine.
>
> If we do decide to go down this road, we will need to think quite a  
> bit
> about how we map our current workflow to Github.  I think this would
> include an easy to follow page on how you do common things with git  
> and
> github, and perhaps even some screencasts.
>
> There are 35 subscribers here.  We have only heard from a handful so
> far.  Hoping for a few more responses this time.
>
> -Rasmus
>
> -- 
> SVN Migration Project Mailing List (http://svn.php.net)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>