Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Github status

[email protected] (sean finney) Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:35:17 +0200
Newsgroups svn.migration
Message-ID <[email protected]>
hi rasmus,

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:20:02AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> I think most people would be fine, not completely happy, but fine with a
> nicely working Subversion setup.  We could perhaps maintain a git tree
> next to it.  If it is on the same host, perhaps we could synch it via a
> post-commit or something so it would never fall behind.

i could definitely count myself in that category.  from our use case
perspective, the git repo would be used mostly for periodically pulling
php changes to our own git repo, and any patches would be going through
your bts or mailing lists anwyay so a read-only copy periodically sync'd
from svn would be fine.  having it local on the same machine as the
svn repo would probably be a good idea, given the size of the codebase
and changehistory.

you'd probably still want some sanity-saving hooks (on both svn and git
sides of the repo), and i'd be happy to help with this if you feel it'd
be useful.


	sean
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ3SalynjLPm522B0RAiqxAJ9hXy70qMOJJCDeZnBvL6sLotZLIACfaJab
S5OWcI97Mt9GbdPdq16pbfA=
=Zb34
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----