Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] GitHub and ACLs

[email protected] (Philip Olson) Wed, 6 May 2009 18:55:13 -0700
Newsgroups svn.migration
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6 May 2009, at 14:33, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> The point would be to see if we had a unanimous desire to move.  We
> didn't.
>
> I really hate making decisions on things I am not going to be  
> working on
> heavily myself, but I think we have been stalled on this for too long
> now, and we should do something, anything, at this point.
>
> So, since I don't think we are that far away from having a working
> Subversion repository, I say we finish that work.  Github as-is isn't
> where we need it to be yet anyway.  I still want to keep an eye on it,
> and we should be looking at ways to separate our code repository from
> our authentication system and the various other bits and pieces that  
> are
> driven off of the CVS password file today.
>
> One thing I wanted to do years ago was to set up php.net as an OpenID
> provider.  If we can get that up and running, then a future move to
> Github (which supports OpenID), or some other mechanism, would be  
> simpler.

Being closer to having unanimous desire before moving to a dvcs [git]  
sounds reasonable. The status quo is CVS and the SVN motto was "CVS  
done right"

Should we tackle the authentication problem before or after the move  
to SVN? Ideally before but after is understandable and more likely.

A general php.net authentication idea has been posted here:
   - http://wiki.php.net/ideas/phpnetauth

I'm sorry to report that the doc team is not yet ready for this move,  
and we'll report back on this later. Knowing that we've chosen one  
(SVN) helps.

Regards,
Philip