Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Re: Proposed repository structure
[email protected] (Derick Rethans)
| Newsgroups | svn.migration |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > > php-src/ > > tsrm/ > > web/ > > php/ > > php-doc/ > > php-master/ > > smarty/ > > <etc.> > > zend/ <this will be Zend 2> > > So and what's up with extensions in general? Have *all* of them in pecl/ > and put them using svn:externals in "release trees"? That I don't think is a good idea. Those extensions that we bundle should be in every normal checkout for two reasons: 1. we easily spot breaks in compilation. 2. people can use a non-release while developing projects to make sure that changes to PHP don't break their code (and v.v.) As everything lives in the same repository, I don't even know whether :externals works here (as it's not external). I think that leaving it like it is now is fine, and moving in/out pecl can just be an "svn mv" or "svn cp". regards, Derick -- HEAD before 5_3!: http://tinyurl.com/6d2esb http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org