Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Re: Proposed repository structure

On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 18:13 -0400, Wez Furlong wrote:
> FWIW, I'm against keeping CVS operational in this way; it just adds  
> more work in the long run.
> We should keep the original CVS repo archived somewhere as a tarball  
> for interested parties, but I see no value in keeping the CVS server  
> functional beyond the transition to SVN.

right, that's why I was talking about the (RCS) ,v files, not CVS, but
mentioning this explicit is good anyways :-)

johannes