Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Proposed repository structure

My objection is just that it would mean maintaining another service;  
if we don't need it, my vote is that we turn it off.

--Wez.

On Sep 2, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:

> Hi!
>
>> My suggestion is to import everything to SVN, and then keep the  
>> tarball of the entire CVS repo somewhere.  This tarball could  
>> potentially also live in a corner of the SVN tree.
>
> Why not keep working r/o CVS? There could be some checkouts for some  
> time that use older versions, and one may want to update those  
> checkouts from latest branch, even if the branch itself is not  
> updated anymore. I know one could move to SVN but it's be a major  
> headache, especially if you had some private stuff in the same place.
>
> I don't see how read-only CVS would hurt anyone - provided it is  
> knows it's not active.