Re: [UG-ADMINS] User Groups and php.net visability
[email protected] (David Rogers)
| Newsgroups | ug.admins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+FH4XdwnCF19_FHdNTZ5wAQLTT1G3nmqUd7gjAUL43-Qoq1Xw@mail.gmail.com> |
I think what @ramsey mentioned earlier has been lost in all the meetoo's and meetup.com vs joind.in debate: What is the point of all these forks in the PHPLeaders org? If it's to promote awareness of those PHP projects, I think you may be doing it wrong. Good intent, sir, as with the addition of those other luminaries, but maybe not the best execution. I just did a spring cleaning of my own Github acct and realized that forking repos isn't necessarily the best way to promote a repo. It just creates noise by having a potentially outdated fork sitting unattended in an account or org. Unles I'm actively contributing to a repo that someone else owns, I do not fork it. Unless there are contributions being made by this org to, say, PHP-FIG, there's practically no reason to have a fork of their work. Lemme say, I'm super-excited about the energy in this conversation and very honored to be on the invite list. Let's just take some Baby Steps. Good work, Team PHP...! David @ OrlandoPHP.org On Dec 5, 2013 4:20 PM, "Ramon de la Fuente" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I’m re-sending my reply of this morning as it didn’t make the list for > some reason: > > I think that is an *excellent* idea! I was a php.net visitor waaay before > I discovered user groups, so I think that could really get people to know > about community much earlier in their careers. The manual pages are a good > candidate for a "did you know there’s a meetup" notice... (next stop: > stackoverflow *grin*) > > —— > > Reading the rest of the thread, I can add that Meetup really worked > (works) for us here in the Netherlands. But I also strongy agree it should > not be made a “standard” because it’s a paid service, not to mention they > keep annoying Rafael Dohms by changing their API without consulting him (so > it’s not stable enough to be relied on). > I’d say we choose a standard for input, and then export meetups from > whatever source a particular group decides to use to the standard. > > > Ramon > > > > This message was sent from my phone and might be a little brief. > > > On 5 dec. 2013, at 06:40, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all (cross posting ug-admin@ and php-webmaster@) > > > > I've been wondering lately what php.net can do to increase cooperation > > between php.net and the PHP User Groups and get stronger relationship > > with the community at large. > > > > Some things I've been thinking about: > > - Printing "hey, did you know there is a PHP User Group meeting > > 4miles from your location tomorrow?" tips on php.net > > - Full UG "registry" > > - Better country/region/state/area listing of User Groups > > - Improving UG visibility on our frontpage > > - UG profile pages > > - Presentation/speaker overview > > ... > > > > I see there are ~140 users on this (ug-admins@) list, I guess most of > > you run or at least are a part of PHP User Groups... is this something > > you guys are interested in? > > Do you have any other ideas and/or would be interested in working on > > this with me? > > > > -Hannes > > > > -- > > Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > -- > Ramon de la Fuente > Future500 BV > > tel: +31(0) 85 8773879 > mob: +31(0) 6 53443008 > > Twitter: @f_u_e_n_t_e > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/future500bv > > > -- > Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >