Re: [UG-ADMINS] User Groups and php.net visability

[email protected] (David Rogers)
Newsgroups ug.admins
Message-ID <CA+FH4XdwnCF19_FHdNTZ5wAQLTT1G3nmqUd7gjAUL43-Qoq1Xw@mail.gmail.com>
I think what @ramsey mentioned earlier has been lost in all the meetoo's
and meetup.com vs joind.in debate:

What is the point of all these forks in the PHPLeaders org?

If it's to promote awareness of those PHP projects, I think you may be
doing it wrong. Good intent, sir, as with the addition of those other
luminaries, but maybe not the best execution.

I just did a spring cleaning of my own Github acct and realized that
forking repos isn't necessarily the best way to promote a repo. It just
creates noise by having a potentially outdated fork sitting unattended in
an account or org. Unles I'm actively contributing to a repo that someone
else owns, I do not fork it. Unless there are contributions being made by
this org to, say, PHP-FIG, there's practically no reason to have a fork of
their work.

Lemme say, I'm super-excited about the energy in this conversation and very
honored to be on the invite list. Let's just take some Baby Steps. Good
work, Team PHP...!

David @ OrlandoPHP.org
On Dec 5, 2013 4:20 PM, "Ramon de la Fuente" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I’m re-sending my reply of this morning as it didn’t make the list for
> some reason:
>
> I think that is an *excellent* idea! I was a php.net visitor waaay before
> I discovered user groups, so I think that could really get people to know
> about community much earlier in their careers. The manual pages are a good
> candidate for a "did you know there’s a meetup" notice... (next stop:
> stackoverflow *grin*)
>
> ——
>
> Reading the rest of the thread, I can add that Meetup really worked
> (works) for us here in the Netherlands. But I also strongy agree it should
> not be made a “standard” because it’s a paid service, not to mention they
> keep annoying Rafael Dohms by changing their API without consulting him (so
> it’s not stable enough to be relied on).
> I’d say we choose a standard for input, and then export meetups from
> whatever source a particular group decides to use to the standard.
>
>
> Ramon
>
>
>
> This message was sent from my phone and might be a little brief.
>
> > On 5 dec. 2013, at 06:40, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all (cross posting ug-admin@ and php-webmaster@)
> >
> > I've been wondering lately what php.net can do to increase cooperation
> > between php.net and the PHP User Groups and get stronger relationship
> > with the community at large.
> >
> > Some things I've been thinking about:
> > - Printing "hey, did you know there is a PHP User Group meeting
> > 4miles from your location tomorrow?" tips on php.net
> > - Full UG "registry"
> > - Better country/region/state/area listing of User Groups
> > - Improving UG visibility on our frontpage
> > - UG profile pages
> > - Presentation/speaker overview
> > ...
> >
> > I see there are ~140 users on this (ug-admins@) list, I guess most of
> > you run or at least are a part of PHP User Groups... is this something
> > you guys are interested in?
> > Do you have any other ideas and/or would be interested in working on
> > this with me?
> >
> > -Hannes
> >
> > --
> > Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ramon de la Fuente
> Future500 BV
>
> tel: +31(0) 85 8773879
> mob: +31(0) 6 53443008
>
> Twitter: @f_u_e_n_t_e
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/future500bv
>
>
> --
> Usergroup Coordination Mailing List (http://ug.php.net)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.