Re: [UG-ADMINS] What about making this list public on https://www.mail-archive.com/
[email protected] (Lorna Mitchell) Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:24:22 +0000
| Newsgroups | ug.admins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD6=mpcuqh2O=_jrqTfrM02ZACwAXomwTabHpgDXwuFR+niwXw@mail.gmail.com> |
By moving the list away from php.net, are we moving the user groups away from the main php.net project, or just choosing a different tooling? I am unclear what structure a new list would be part of, so I'm unsure about this move but I'm definitely +1 on making it easier for user group leaders to be in touch with one another. Lorna On 30 January 2016 at 08:46, Sean Prunka <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems that all the current venues are effectively open to the public. > > This list, for public announcements. > IRC, for various discussions. > Slack, for inter-group coordination. > > Perhaps keeping all of these and adding a "closed" group mailing list for > leadership concerns, advice, and the like might not be a bad idea. > > Each venue currently available (and proposed) adds value to a different > aspect of UG leadership and/or "daily" operations. > > I do also recognize that have to many disparate venues of communication > leads to disorganization, confusion, and the potential for cross-posting > and mis-posting. > > I'm not sure where the happy medium exists. > > --Sean > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016, 03:23 Andreas Heigl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Sean. > > > > Am 30.01.16 um 08:05 schrieb Sean Prunka: > > > It sounds like there is a strong desire for a public facing presence > that > > > is [perhaps] more accessible to new UGs and to the community at large > > than > > > this list currently is; > > > > > > But at the same time, there is a desire for a private discussion area > > where > > > we can "talk shop" about things specific to UG admins that do not need > to > > > be (and in some cases, perhaps should not be) publicly > > readable/accessible. > > > > > > Is there a convenient way to both have our cake and eat it too? > > > > I don't think there's a way to have *both* approaches in one single list. > > > > There is this list for UG-Admins with announcments and infos that is > > publicly available (if you know where to search for it) and there's the > > IRC-Channel #phpgroups (which is always rather quiet). It's the "old > > school" INformation channel and especially the Mailinglist sometimes > > contains material that should not be publicly available in my eyes. > > Every Person running a usergroup should be registered here. > > > > And than there's the phpug-slack team at https://phpug.slack.com[1] > > where not only the usergroup-leaders are welcome to join but also the > > usergroup-members. I set that team up as part of php.ug to enable > > usergroups to easily interact with one another and to allow easy > > interaction between different usergroups. It has *never* been though as > > a replacement to this mailinglist but as an addition! So far it seems to > > work out. So that would be a more public approach that is strongly > > frequented especially by new usergroups. > > > > And those two "solutions" can perfectyl coexist in my eyes. Or do you > > think otherwise? > > > > Cheers > > > > Andreas > > > > [1] Get an invitation to the slack team from > > http://murmuring-forest-7062.herokuapp.com/ > > -- > > ,,, > > (o o) > > +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ > > | Andreas Heigl | > > | mailto:[email protected] N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | > > | http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 | > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | http://hei.gl/root-ca | > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > > -- Lorna Mitchell http://lornajane.net