Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 6/7] dlm: use FL_SLEEP to determine blocking vs non-blocking
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Aug 2023 14:18:46 -0400
| Newsgroups | com.redhat.cluster-devel,dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 17:33 -0400, Alexander Aring wrote: > This patch uses the FL_SLEEP flag in struct file_lock to determine if > the lock request is a blocking or non-blocking request. Before dlm was > using IS_SETLKW() was being used which is not usable for lock requests > coming from lockd when EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK inside the export flags > is set. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <[email protected]> > --- > fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c > index 0094fa4004cc..0c6ed5eeb840 100644 > --- a/fs/dlm/plock.c > +++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file, > op->info.optype = DLM_PLOCK_OP_LOCK; > op->info.pid = fl->fl_pid; > op->info.ex = (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK); > - op->info.wait = IS_SETLKW(cmd); > + op->info.wait = !!(fl->fl_flags & FL_SLEEP); > op->info.fsid = ls->ls_global_id; > op->info.number = number; > op->info.start = fl->fl_start; Not sure you really need the !!, but ok... Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>