Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v6 1/7] fs: pass the request_mask to generic_fillattr

Jeff Layton <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:58:47 -0400
Newsgroups com.redhat.cluster-devel,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,dev.linux.lists.v9fs,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.ecryptfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 23:44 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:58:14AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > generic_fillattr just fills in the entire stat struct indiscriminately
> > today, copying data from the inode. There is at least one attribute
> > (STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE) that can have side effects when it is reported,
> > and we're looking at adding more with the addition of multigrain
> > timestamps.
> >=20
> > Add a request_mask argument to generic_fillattr and have most callers
> > just pass in the value that is passed to getattr. Have other callers
> > (e.g. ksmbd) just pass in STATX_BASIC_STATS. Also move the setting of
> > STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE into generic_fillattr.
>=20
> Out of curiosity - how much PITA would it be to put request_mask into
> kstat?  Set it in vfs_getattr_nosec() (and those get_file_..._info()
> on smbd side) and don't bother with that kind of propagation boilerplate
> - just have generic_fillattr() pick it there...
>=20
> Reduces the patchset size quite a bit...

It could be done. To do that right, I think we'd want to drop
request_mask from the ->getattr prototype as well and just have
everything use the mask in the kstat.

I don't think it'd reduce the size of the patchset in any meaningful
way, but it might make for a more sensible API over the long haul.
--=20
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>