Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v7 12/13] ext4: switch to multigrain timestamps

Jeff Layton wrote:
> I'm not sure what we can do for this test. The nap() function is making
> an assumption that the timestamp granularity will be constant, and that
> isn't necessarily the case now.

This is only of secondary importance, because the scenario by Jan Kara
shows a much more fundamental breakage:

> > The ultimate problem is that a sequence like:
> > 
> > write(f1)
> > stat(f2)
> > write(f2)
> > stat(f2)
> > write(f1)
> > stat(f1)
> >
> > can result in f1 timestamp to be (slightly) lower than the final f2
> > timestamp because the second write to f1 didn't bother updating the
> > timestamp. That can indeed be a bit confusing to programs if they compare
> > timestamps between two files. Jeff?
> > 
> 
> Basically yes.

f1 was last written to *after* f2 was last written to. If the timestamp of f1
is then lower than the timestamp of f2, timestamps are fundamentally broken.

Many things in user-space depend on timestamps, such as build system
centered around 'make', but also 'find ... -newer ...'.

Bruno