Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v7 12/13] ext4: switch to multigrain timestamps
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:26:23 -0400
| Newsgroups | com.redhat.cluster-devel,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,dev.linux.lists.v9fs,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.ecryptfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 14:08 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > I wasn't proposing to do that work for v6.6. For that, we absolutely > > either need the mount option or to just revert the mgtime conversions. >=20 > This sounds like you want me to do a full-on revert of your series but > why? The conversion and changes support an actual use-case and are fine. > It's a matter of whether we unconditionally expose it to users or not. >=20 I don't, actually. I'm just mentioning that it's possible if we find the mount option to be unpalatable. > @Jan, what do you think? >=20 > > My plan was to take a stab at doing this for a later kernel release. >=20 > Ok. If it works out, then we may be able to eventually remove the mount option, but that is a separate project altogether. --=20 Jeff Layton <[email protected]>