Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] fanotify: define struct members to hold response decision context
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | com.redhat.linux-audit,org.kernel.vger.linux-api,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20221219101023.6bqjj3jg3il2fbzf@quack3> |
On Fri 16-12-22 12:05:14, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 11:43 AM Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon 12-12-22 09:06:10, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > This patch adds a flag, FAN_INFO and an extensible buffer to provide > > > additional information about response decisions. The buffer contains > > > one or more headers defining the information type and the length of the > > > following information. The patch defines one additional information > > > type, FAN_RESPONSE_INFO_AUDIT_RULE, to audit a rule number. This will > > > allow for the creation of other information types in the future if other > > > users of the API identify different needs. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <[email protected]> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2745105.e9J7NaK4W3@x2 > > > Suggested-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > > > > Thanks for the patches. They look very good to me. Just two nits below. I > > can do the small updates on commit if there would be no other changes. But > > I'd like to get some review from audit guys for patch 3/3 before I commit > > this. > > It's in my review queue, but it's a bit lower in the pile as my > understanding is that the linux-next folks don't like to see new > things in the next branches until after the merge window closes. Sure, there's no hurry :). I just wanted to make it clear where the things stand. Honza -- Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit