Re: Can AUDIT_LIST_RULES causes kthreadd-spam?
Rinat Gadelshin <[email protected]> Thu, 4 May 2023 01:12:20 +0300
| Newsgroups | com.redhat.linux-audit,org.kernel.vger.audit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04.05.2023 00:27, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 5:14 PM Rinat Gadelshin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello there =) >> >> My name is Rinat. >> I'm a newbie here (at Linux kernel developer community). >> >> My current job is to work with audit subsystem on different >> versions of Linux (and different kernel versions from 3.10 to the latest) >> with and without auditd. >> >> My program works behalf of root account and uses netlink >> (unicast or multicast depends of the kernel's version) >> to communicate with audit subsystem of the kernel. >> >> If actual audit rule list has been changed >> then my program should restore the configured audit rule list. >> >> To do it the program periodically (with 60 seconds interval) >> requests the actual rule list be sending AUDIT_LIST_RULES. >> >> All rules are receiving perfectly. >> >> But I've noticed that there are many (2K+ for 5 minutes test) >> kthreadd process have been spawned after that request >> (I've stubbed the poll code and compare logs). > Hi Rinat, > > First, a quick note that audit discussions involving the upstream > Linux Kernel have moved to the [email protected] list (CC'd), > please direct future emails there. > > Can you be more specific about the kernel threads you are seeing, are > you seeing multiple "kauditd" threads? > > % ps -fC kauditd > UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD > root 89 2 0 Apr28 ? 00:00:00 [kauditd] > >> Please, can you point me, what can I do to avoid this kthreadd-spam. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Best regards >> Rinath Hi Paul, Thank you for your quick answer. I swear to copy my future questions about audit subsystem to [email protected] =) My logs don't provide lot of info about nature of the kthreadds. (I hadn't written the log system). I have something like this: ...pid: 2, uniquePid: 000082d800000002, fileName: kthreadd, lcFileName: kthreadd, name: kthreadd, commandLine: Skipped, lcCommandLine: Skipped, sessionId: 0, isRemote: 0, syscallName: fork, uid: 4294967295, gid: 4294967295, euid: 4294967295, egid: 4294967295, logonSessionUid: -1, logonSessionUsername: Skipped, logonSessionRemoteHost: , exeOwnerUid: 0, exeOwnerGid: 0, exeMode: 0, exeInode: 0, exeCapsVersion: , exeCapsRootId: , exeCapsEffective: , exeCapsPermitted: , exeCapsInheritable: , dstPid: 106574, dstTid: 0, dstUniquePid: 000083b10001a04e, requestId: 2684354949, startTime: 01d97d1fb24aa38e, hash: 00000000000000000000000000000000, cwd: , flags: 00000011, processState: 3, int: 0, type: 00000000.. And such events occurred 1208 times when AUDIT_LIST_RULES is sending. The test has lasted 2 minutes. The same test in which the request was disabled produced only 122 such records. It was the only difference between the tests. As I can see it was a fork syscall of kthreadd. Are there any debug options for the kernel that I can set, rebuild the kernel, re-run the test and clarify the situation? -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit