Re: [PATCH] wireguard/queueing: simplify wg_cpumask_next_online()

Yury Norov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <aEGooNws-KihCuWh@yury>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:33:19PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 12:23:29AM -0400, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 07:36:55PM -0400, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > wg_cpumask_choose_online() opencodes cpumask_nth(). Use it and make the
> > > function significantly simpler. While there, fix opencoded cpu_online()
> > > too. 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h | 14 ++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h b/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
> > > index 7eb76724b3ed..3bfe16f71af0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
> > > @@ -104,17 +104,11 @@ static inline void wg_reset_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, bool encapsulating)
> > >  
> > >  static inline int wg_cpumask_choose_online(int *stored_cpu, unsigned int id)
> > >  {
> > > -	unsigned int cpu = *stored_cpu, cpu_index, i;
> > > +	if (likely(*stored_cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(*stored_cpu)))
> > > +		return cpu;
> > 
> > Oops... This should be 
> >                 return *stored_cpu;
> 
> Maybe it's best to structure the function something like:
> 
> unsigned int cpu = *stored_cpu;
> if (unlikely(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))) {
> 	cpu = *stored_cpu = cpumask_nth(id % num_online_cpus(),	cpu_online_mask);
> return cpu;

If you prefer. I'll send v2 shortly
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.