Re: [PATCH RFC 06/35] mm/page_alloc: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in alloc_contig_range_noprof()
SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 22:06:32 +0200 David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's reject them early, I like early failures. :) > which in turn makes folio_alloc_gigantic() reject > them properly. > > To avoid converting from order to nr_pages, let's just add MAX_FOLIO_ORDER > and calculate MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES based on that. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Acked-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]> Thanks, SJ [...]