Re: [PATCH v1 24/36] ata: libata-eh: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry
Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Western Digital Research |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/29/25 2:53 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:28AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a >> single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage. >> >> Cc: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> >> Cc: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> > > LGTM, so: > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Just noticed this: s/libata-eh/libata-sff in the commit title please. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research