Re: [PATCH v1 13/36] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()
David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28.08.25 10:37, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 10:18:23AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 28.08.25 10:06, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 09:44:27AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 28.08.25 09:21, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:17AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * We mark all tail pages with memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(), >>>>>> + * so these pages are completely uninitialized. >>>>> >>>>> ^ not? ;-) >>>> >>>> Can you elaborate? >>> >>> Oh, sorry, I misread "uninitialized". >>> Still, I'd phrase it as >>> >>> /* >>> * We marked all tail pages with memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(), >>> * so we must initialize them here. >>> */ >> >> I prefer what I currently have, but thanks for the review. > > No strong feelings, feel free to add > > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> > I now have "As we marked all tail pages with memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(), we must initialize them ourselves here." -- Cheers David / dhildenb