Re: [PATCH v1 21/36] mm/cma: refuse handing out non-contiguous page ranges
David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28.08.25 19:28, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:25AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Let's disallow handing out PFN ranges with non-contiguous pages, so we >> can remove the nth-page usage in __cma_alloc(), and so any callers don't >> have to worry about that either when wanting to blindly iterate pages. >> >> This is really only a problem in configs with SPARSEMEM but without >> SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, and only when we would cross memory sections in some >> cases. > > I'm guessing this is something that we don't need to worry about in > reality? That my theory yes. > >> >> Will this cause harm? Probably not, because it's mostly 32bit that does >> not support SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. If this ever becomes a problem we could >> look into allocating the memmap for the memory sections spanned by a >> single CMA region in one go from memblock. >> >> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> > > LGTM other than refactoring point below. > > CMA stuff looks fine afaict after staring at it for a while, on proviso > that handing out ranges within the same section is always going to be the > case. > > Anyway overall, > > LGTM, so: > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> > > >> --- >> include/linux/mm.h | 6 ++++++ >> mm/cma.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> mm/util.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h >> index f6880e3225c5c..2ca1eb2db63ec 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h >> @@ -209,9 +209,15 @@ extern unsigned long sysctl_user_reserve_kbytes; >> extern unsigned long sysctl_admin_reserve_kbytes; >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) >> +bool page_range_contiguous(const struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages); >> #define nth_page(page,n) pfn_to_page(page_to_pfn((page)) + (n)) >> #else >> #define nth_page(page,n) ((page) + (n)) >> +static inline bool page_range_contiguous(const struct page *page, >> + unsigned long nr_pages) >> +{ >> + return true; >> +} >> #endif >> >> /* to align the pointer to the (next) page boundary */ >> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c >> index e56ec64d0567e..813e6dc7b0954 100644 >> --- a/mm/cma.c >> +++ b/mm/cma.c >> @@ -780,10 +780,8 @@ static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct cma_memrange *cmr, >> unsigned long count, unsigned int align, >> struct page **pagep, gfp_t gfp) >> { >> - unsigned long mask, offset; >> - unsigned long pfn = -1; >> - unsigned long start = 0; >> unsigned long bitmap_maxno, bitmap_no, bitmap_count; >> + unsigned long start, pfn, mask, offset; >> int ret = -EBUSY; >> struct page *page = NULL; >> >> @@ -795,7 +793,7 @@ static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct cma_memrange *cmr, >> if (bitmap_count > bitmap_maxno) >> goto out; >> >> - for (;;) { >> + for (start = 0; ; start = bitmap_no + mask + 1) { >> spin_lock_irq(&cma->lock); >> /* >> * If the request is larger than the available number >> @@ -812,6 +810,22 @@ static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct cma_memrange *cmr, >> spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock); >> break; >> } >> + >> + pfn = cmr->base_pfn + (bitmap_no << cma->order_per_bit); >> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn); >> + >> + /* >> + * Do not hand out page ranges that are not contiguous, so >> + * callers can just iterate the pages without having to worry >> + * about these corner cases. >> + */ >> + if (!page_range_contiguous(page, count)) { >> + spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock); >> + pr_warn_ratelimited("%s: %s: skipping incompatible area [0x%lx-0x%lx]", >> + __func__, cma->name, pfn, pfn + count - 1); >> + continue; >> + } >> + >> bitmap_set(cmr->bitmap, bitmap_no, bitmap_count); >> cma->available_count -= count; >> /* >> @@ -821,29 +835,24 @@ static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct cma_memrange *cmr, >> */ >> spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock); >> >> - pfn = cmr->base_pfn + (bitmap_no << cma->order_per_bit); >> mutex_lock(&cma->alloc_mutex); >> ret = alloc_contig_range(pfn, pfn + count, ACR_FLAGS_CMA, gfp); >> mutex_unlock(&cma->alloc_mutex); >> - if (ret == 0) { >> - page = pfn_to_page(pfn); >> + if (!ret) >> break; >> - } >> >> cma_clear_bitmap(cma, cmr, pfn, count); >> if (ret != -EBUSY) >> break; >> >> pr_debug("%s(): memory range at pfn 0x%lx %p is busy, retrying\n", >> - __func__, pfn, pfn_to_page(pfn)); >> + __func__, pfn, page); >> >> - trace_cma_alloc_busy_retry(cma->name, pfn, pfn_to_page(pfn), >> - count, align); >> - /* try again with a bit different memory target */ >> - start = bitmap_no + mask + 1; >> + trace_cma_alloc_busy_retry(cma->name, pfn, page, count, align); >> } >> out: >> - *pagep = page; >> + if (!ret) >> + *pagep = page; >> return ret; >> } >> >> @@ -882,7 +891,7 @@ static struct page *__cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, unsigned long count, >> */ >> if (page) { >> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) >> - page_kasan_tag_reset(nth_page(page, i)); >> + page_kasan_tag_reset(page + i); >> } >> >> if (ret && !(gfp & __GFP_NOWARN)) { >> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c >> index d235b74f7aff7..0bf349b19b652 100644 >> --- a/mm/util.c >> +++ b/mm/util.c >> @@ -1280,4 +1280,37 @@ unsigned int folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, >> { >> return folio_pte_batch_flags(folio, NULL, ptep, &pte, max_nr, 0); >> } >> + >> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) >> +/** >> + * page_range_contiguous - test whether the page range is contiguous >> + * @page: the start of the page range. >> + * @nr_pages: the number of pages in the range. >> + * >> + * Test whether the page range is contiguous, such that they can be iterated >> + * naively, corresponding to iterating a contiguous PFN range. >> + * >> + * This function should primarily only be used for debug checks, or when >> + * working with page ranges that are not naturally contiguous (e.g., pages >> + * within a folio are). >> + * >> + * Returns true if contiguous, otherwise false. >> + */ >> +bool page_range_contiguous(const struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages) >> +{ >> + const unsigned long start_pfn = page_to_pfn(page); >> + const unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages; >> + unsigned long pfn; >> + >> + /* >> + * The memmap is allocated per memory section. We need to check >> + * each involved memory section once. >> + */ >> + for (pfn = ALIGN(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); >> + pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) >> + if (unlikely(page + (pfn - start_pfn) != pfn_to_page(pfn))) >> + return false; > > I find this pretty confusing, my test for this is how many times I have to read > the code to understand what it's doing :) > > So we have something like: > > (pfn of page) > start_pfn pfn = align UP > | | > v v > | section | > <-----------------> > pfn - start_pfn > > Then check page + (pfn - start_pfn) == pfn_to_page(pfn) > > And loop such that: > > (pfn of page) > start_pfn pfn > | | > v v > | section | section | > <------------------------------------------> > pfn - start_pfn > > Again check page + (pfn - start_pfn) == pfn_to_page(pfn) > > And so on. > > So the logic looks good, but it's just... that took me a hot second to > parse :) > > I think a few simple fixups > > bool page_range_contiguous(const struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages) > { > const unsigned long start_pfn = page_to_pfn(page); > const unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages; > /* The PFN of the start of the next section. */ > unsigned long pfn = ALIGN(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > /* The page we'd expected to see if the range were contiguous. */ > struct page *expected = page + (pfn - start_pfn); > > /* > * The memmap is allocated per memory section. We need to check > * each involved memory section once. > */ > for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION, expected += PAGES_PER_SECTION) > if (unlikely(expected != pfn_to_page(pfn))) > return false; > return true; > } > Hm, I prefer my variant, especially where the pfn is calculated in the for loop. Likely a matter of personal taste. But I can see why skipping the first section might be a surprise when not having the semantics of ALIGN() in the cache. So I'll add the following on top: diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c index 0bf349b19b652..fbdb73aaf35fe 100644 --- a/mm/util.c +++ b/mm/util.c @@ -1303,8 +1303,10 @@ bool page_range_contiguous(const struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages) unsigned long pfn; /* - * The memmap is allocated per memory section. We need to check - * each involved memory section once. + * The memmap is allocated per memory section, so no need to check + * within the first section. However, we need to check each other + * spanned memory section once, making sure the first page in a + * section could similarly be reached by just iterating pages. */ for (pfn = ALIGN(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) Thanks! -- Cheers David / dhildenb